h1

Revisiting Namu

May 9, 2007

A few months back, we visited Namu, then an essentially brand new restaurant in the Inner Richmond offering Asian-inspired small plates, mostly showcasing the flavors of Korea and Japan. In our first report about this restaurant, we mentioned that while the food was good, the fact that it is a contemporary or “fusion” restaurant demands more challenging dishes and a higher level of creativity than what we experienced. To be sure, part of the reason we felt that way was that we went at lunch, rather than dinner. It only seems fair to investigate some of the dishes that are special to the dinner menu, so one evening we did exactly that.

A traditional Korean meal will feature a collection of banchan, smaller side dishes that are meant to accompany the main entree. There are many varieties, but the most famous of these is kimchi, a fermented dish of vegetables; very often this is cabbage with chili peppers, but there are many varieties. Despite the fact that Namu does not generally serve precisely traditional Japanese or Korean dishes, there is a nod to the tradition of banchan, since every dinner at Namu begins with a banchan plate:

tb_namu_2_banchan_plate.jpg

Only one serving is complimentary, but the banchan plate appears on the menu (for $2.50) if one taste is not enough. The two portions on the left were simple preparations of carrot and shiitake mushrooms, while the sample on the far right is of course the kimchi, made in-house, which was our favorite of the three. The cabbage was crisp and fresh, and the spiciness was balanced, clarified, and focused, as little sparks of pepper danced on our tongue. It was a nice way to begin the meal.

Next up was the scallop carpaccio,

tb_namu_2_scallops.jpg

consisting of Hokkaido scallops, cilantro, small cubes of tomato and a touch of delicate yuzu vinaigrette all atop thin rounds of cucumber. The thin, confetti-like strips of cilantro and the small of touch of acid from the tomato helped to accentuate the delicate sweetness of the scallop. The flavors here are subtle, not bold, but still satisfying. These scallop bites are actually reminiscent of nigiri sushi, and eating them in a similar way seems to be the best way to go. The traditional way to eat nigiri is not only to dip the fish (not the rice) side in the soy sauce, but also to place the piece fish-side down in one’s mouth, so that the neta (the fish slice) makes immediate and direct contact with the tongue. With this dish at Namu, the more uniform taste and texture of the cucumber slice may conceal the action on top of the slice, and so just like with nigiri, flipping each piece helps to emphasize the textural and flavor contrasts of the scallop, cilantro, and tomato.

The shiitake mushrooms from the banchan plate made a repeat appearance,

tb_namu_2_dumplings.jpg

this time hiding in fresh, neatly-wrapped dumplings — garnished with scallions and thin seaweed strips, and resting in a mushroom dashi broth. Good ingredients were used, and the dashi paired well with the mushrooms in the interior of the dumplings pouches, but to our taste, the dumplings could have used a contrasting flavor to enliven them.

The last dish was the eggplant,

tb_namu_2_eggplant.jpg

which was served with a tasty onion sesame vinaigrette. The texture of eggplant can sometimes be difficult to work with, but the eggplant in this case was cooked just the right amount and held up very nicely, benefiting from the contrasting texture of the katsuobushi (bonito) flakes. As you can see in the picture, the eggplant slices have nice grill marks on them, and the dish has good presentation; the flower carved from carrot emphasizes that the eggplant is sliced into pieces that look like the petals of a flower.

All in all, we had an enjoyable meal at Namu. Dishes are generally well-prepared and use good ingredients, and although service was perfectly friendly on our first visit, it seemed to be even more knowledgeable, expert and polished the second time around. In the first post, we mentioned that even though the food was good, we personally would not have cravings for the dishes at Namu (even though we regularly have cravings for the more traditional dishes that are the inspiration for Namu’s offerings). This is still the case, but it’s all a matter of taste, and we are glad we returned to dinner to try more of the menu.

Although one can obviously order a full meal’s worth of food here, in our mind, Namu’s ideal role is less that of a traditional restaurant, and more of a lounge, a place to unwind and socialize with friends over a few well-prepared “Asian tapas bar bites” and a glass of sake or wine — not exactly an izakaya, since the atmosphere is different, but somehow similar in spirit. Ironically, as of our last visit that led to this post (the actual restaurant visit was in April, not May), Namu had still not procured its liquor license. Fighting through the bureaucracy to get this license can be frustrating, and we certainly do not hold it against them that the details are still being worked out; rather, we are glad that they are being persistent. However, in our view, the character and spirit of Namu will really blossom once the drink aspect is introduced to accompany the dishes, which often consist of just a few bites, making them ideal to share with a small group. For our first review of Namu, restaurant co-owner Dennis Lee was nice enough to drop by and leave a couple notes in the comments section, indicating that the restaurant would soon offer wine, beer, and sake, and that the sake part of the menu was being compiled by Seana Adachi, who has lived, worked with, and learned from sake masters in Japan. This should be an interesting development when it gets off the ground.

In light of this second visit, we’d like to update our original rating of Namu:

RATING:

COST:

Please scroll down to the bottom of our original post for restaurant location and hours. Since our first review, Namu has introduced a brunch menu, and the hours have been updated to reflect this change.

h1

Naan ‘n Curry on Van Ness

May 1, 2007

Naan ‘n Curry, that ever-expanding empire of cheap, mediocre curry restaurants in San Francisco and the East Bay, has, in recent months, conquered more territory and set up a new province — this time, at the corner of Turk and Van Ness, in the border region between Civic Center and the Tenderloin.

tb_naan_curry_van_ness_storefront.jpg

We’ve been going to Naan ‘n Curry restaurants in both San Francisco and the East Bay for years upon years now; they have such a cult following here, it is essentially impossible to avoid them. Whenever going out with friends for a meal, someone is bound to suggest “Well, what about Naan ‘n Curry?” Then someone else will say: “Yeah, great idea!” By that point, the damage is done, and our attempts at countering this train of thought usually fail, especially since their well-placed restaurants are often frustratingly accessible. Anyway, the end result is many trips to Naan ‘n Curry. In a post from last year, in which we reviewed various locations of Naan ‘n Curry en masse, we essentially put forth the following opinion: sometimes Naan ‘n Curry can produce some decently tasty dishes, and other times they are not at at all tasty or well-prepared. All in all, everything averages out to a mediocre 2-star experience. The fare at Naan ‘n Curry is by no means the “best of the Bay.” The obvious draw here is the cheap price, but it is always worth noting that restaurants like Darbar manage to serve superior fare for perhaps slightly higher (but still entirely comparable) prices.

So, given this opinion, why would Short Exact ever go to a Naan ‘n Curry on our own, voluntarily? Well, the main reason is to respond to readers of this blog — not directly, as no one has ever emailed us to specifically ask for a review of the new Van Ness Naan ‘n Curry. However, we’ve noticed that increasingly, many people doing Google searches end up on this site by typing in strings like “naan n curry van ness”, and the like. Now, we haven’t reviewed this particular branch before now, but we have reviewed Naan ‘n Curry, and one of the neighborhoods listed in the side bar at the right is “Polk Gulch/Van Ness.” The combination of these two text strings has led people to this site, even if this restaurant didn’t specifically appear here. At any rate, we felt bad about all the people who came here looking for a Van Ness review but didn’t find it, so hopefully this post will fill in that gap.

Naan ‘n Curry restaurants are never stylish, but this particular branch has a surprisingly fun, comfortable, well-put-together interior. With the branch on O’Farrell (on the border of Union Square and the Tenderloin), this is probably one of the nicer looking branches. The dining protocol is exactly the same, though: study the menu while standing near the doorway, order your meal at the counter, and then bring your own plates, silverware, and water to the table.

We ordered the chicken biryani:

tb_naan_curry_van_ness_biryani.jpg

This dish was acceptably good, and it was of better quality than what we’ve largely come to expect out of Naan ‘n Curry. A recurring problem with Naan ‘n Curry is having to wade through pools of excess oil on the plate, and while this dish was oily, the oil was generally kept in check — although this is at least partly due to the fact that we did not order one of Naan ‘n Curry’s trademark watery curries, opting instead for the biryani, a dish of chicken and rice. The basmati rice added an aromatic touch, and the cumin and cardamom (both should have been more pronounced) managed to permeate through to rather moist, surprisingly tender pieces of chicken, although the dish was a tad oversalted. As the above picture makes clear, the presentation of this dish was not exquisite (with the chicken rather unceremoniously buried beneath the mounds of rice), and this preparation somehow lacked the wonderful characteristic fragrance of an excellent biryani, but overall, this was surprisingly decent. On the grand scale of things, not great, but definitely pretty good for Naan ‘n Curry.

Service seems to be a touch slower than at other branches of Naan ‘n Curry, but we couldn’t say for sure if that’s true in general, since we’ve only made this one visit to the Van Ness branch. At any rate, it’s a little hard what to make of this trip, since it is only one visit. Is this Naan ‘n Curry truly better than the other branches, or did we just happen to stumble upon a decent dish? To be certain, we’d have to go a few more times, but for now, we’ll give them the benefit of the doubt. This post is not a ringing endorsement, though, so take it with a grain of sea salt.

RATING:

COST:

690 Van Ness Avenue (at Turk St.)
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone: 415.775.1349
Hours: Mon-Thurs, 11:00 am – 10:00 pm; Fri, 11:00 am – 11:00 pm; Sat, 11:30 am – 11:00 pm; Sun, 11:30 am – 10:00 pm.

Cuisine: Indian/Pakistani
Neighborhood: Polk Gulch/Van Ness

How to get there: Muni lines 5, 31, 38, 47, and 49.

h1

Le Cheval: Quit Horsing Around

April 20, 2007

Le Cheval is a Vietnamese restaurant located at 10th and Clay in downtown Oakland, a few blocks from Chinatown and the City Center. Really, though, it’s not just a Vietnamese restaurant in downtown Oakland. It’s the Vietnamese restaurant — certainly not because it’s the best Vietnamese in the immediate vicinity, but just because of its reputation and history. The restaurant has been around since 1985, and in downtown Oakland — an area that is currently in the midst of a revitalization (or gentrification, if you prefer), but for many people, is still synonymous with crime, empty streets, and urban blight — that is indeed saying something. In the 1980′s, many people fled the city in response to its high crime rate, and the buildings downtown emptied out. The Loma Prieta earthquake in 1989 essentially sealed the deal, because once the buildings became uninhabitable and physically unsafe after the earthquake, there really was little reason for people to stay. Downtown Oakland, once a bustling boomtown and the cultural heart of the East Bay, became a neglected ghost town. Of course, there were workers in the area during the week from 9-5, but come nights and weekends, the area pretty much evacuated — a hollow skeleton lacking flesh and blood to give it life. In the past few years, renewed interest in the area has brought about an influx of new apartments, bars, clubs, and restaurants. It is a work in progress, though, and even now, almost 20 years after the earthquake, downtown feels quieter and more subdued than it should.

What does any of this have to do with Le Cheval? Well, Le Cheval stuck around, through thick and thin, when very few others did, and for that, Short Exact would like to give them a gracious nod and word of thanks. Combined with Chinatown (the only part of downtown Oakland which has remained thoroughly and consistently bustling throughout this whole period), Le Cheval became one of the beacons of light that city politicians could rally around and point to, as evidence that the downtown area would one day soon come into its own again and regain its rightful place as the pulsing urban heart of the East Bay. Former mayor Jerry Brown was particularly fond of this restaurant, and he often mentioned it in connection with his own extensive (one might almost say obsessive) effort at breathing new life into the downtown core.

It isn’t hard to see why he has a fondness for this place, beyond just the fact that they stuck around when most others left. The decor of the large restaurant floor, unsurprisingly, features lots of horses (for any Francophobes reading, “cheval” is the French word for “horse”), and provides an atmosphere that, while on the noisy side, is a cut or two above what you would find at a hole-in-the-wall. There is also a feeling about Le Cheval that is distinctly Oakland, one which you won’t necessarily find that often, even at other establishments in Oakland, and it is a noticeable contrast to the hyped “see and be seen” mentality that characterizes many restaurants in San Francisco. Oakland may be somewhat grittier, rougher around the edges, and less fashionable than its elegant, foggy cousin across the Bay, but it has a refreshingly casual, down-to-earth attitude that is in evidence at tables all over the large, spacious floor of Le Cheval. It is a cliche (but nonetheless, a true cliche) that one of Oakland’s greatest strengths is its diversity, and there is a comfortable, organic, and completely unforced sort of diversity that we’ve consistently observed in the people eating at Le Cheval — and it is not as common as you’d think it would be, even here in the Bay Area, a region fond of touting itself as a bastion of diversity.

We don’t usually give this sort of historical/sociological introduction to restaurants, but it seemed to be an appropriate thing to do for Le Cheval, because while our last visit demonstrated a noticeable decline in terms of both food and service, we still wanted to convey the affection we have for this restaurant, in spite of any possible decline.

Anyway, after all that text, you probably want some pictures to rest your eyes a bit, so without further ado, let’s move onto the food:

tb_le_cheval_salad.jpg

This was the goi sua sen, a salad full of steamed shrimp, cabbage, thin strips of jellyfish, lotus roots, and cilantro and mint leaves, all topped with a garnish of chopped peanuts. This was a light, refreshing dish with fresh ingredients, but as often seems to be the case at more Americanized Vietnamese restaurants, the dressing, based on fish sauce and vinegar, was too light (read: bland) . The salad would have benefited from a dressing with more body. We also started with an order of (what else) but the goi cuon shrimp rolls, with vermicelli, mint, and lettuce wrapped in rice paper. The rolls were not exemplary, as some of the greens were not at maximum freshness (old and wilted), and there were random holes and sloppy sections in the wrapping.

Our entree was the lemon grass calimari (muc xao xa ot), served with white rice,

tb_le_cheval_calamari.jpg

and unfortunately, this was also sort of a disappointment. Despite being labeled “spicy”, the dish was not the least bit so. Hints of a flat, one-dimensional curry and lemon grass emerged, but even though this sauce drowned and completely overpowered the calimari, it was not nearly as flavorful and aromatic as it could have been. Meanwhile, a lot of the character, bounce, and crisp texture had been cooked out of the onions and the calimari, giving many pieces a rubbery profile. The dish did not taste reheated at all, and it wasn’t terrible, but it was mediocre and unnuanced. We would mostly likely not order this dish again, especially with so many other choices on the menu.

In the past, the service at Le Cheval was always closer to brisk and efficient than courteous, but on our most recent visit, the service was inexperienced and indifferent, at best. An awkward delay passed between the time we placed the order and received the appetizers, but then the entree arrived just seconds later, right on the heel of the starters. The servers insisted on crowding all dishes into one corner of the table rather than spreading them out in a more useful way, and so we were forced to rearrange the whole table ourselves into a suitable format before eating. There weren’t any mistakes made in the order, so the service wasn’t horrible, but the prices, while reasonable, are not exactly cheap (most entrees pass above the $10 mark), and we don’t think it’s unfair to expect at least somewhat better service at this price point.

Generally, we were pretty disappointed in Le Cheval after this visit. Le Cheval was never great Vietnamese food, nor was it ever the best in downtown Oakland, since this area (including Chinatown) has a fairly dense cluster of Vietnamese restaurants. It is, however, an Oakland institution, and even if their cuisine was never the best, it was usually at least decent, and oftentimes quite good — good enough to warrant return visits. It has been some years since we were last here, and it is sad for us to see a restaurant with this much history decline. Business still seems to be good, thanks to its reputation, but reputation can only carry you so far, if there is a lack of substance to back it up.

Anyway, we sincerely hope that Le Cheval quits horsing around. This restaurant, with over two decades of history, has long been an anchor in a once flailing downtown area, and now that downtown is finally starting to blossom and be recognized in the way that it deserves to be, Le Cheval needs to get its act together so that it can continue to keep its place as a loved institution for many years to come.

RATING:

COST:

1007 Clay Street (at 10th St.)
Oakland, CA 94607
Phone: 510.763.8495
Hours: Mon-Sat, 11:00 am – 9:30 pm; Sun, 5:00 pm – 9:30 pm.

Cuisine: Vietnamese
Neighborhood: Downtown Oakland

How to get there: The restaurant is only a few blocks from the Oakland City Center/12 St BART station. AC Transit lines: 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 40, 43, 51, 63, 72, 82 and 88.

Note: There is another branch of this restaurant, “Le Petit Cheval” in Berkeley, but this review only covers the main Oakland restaurant.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.